The following articles
appeared in this month's issues of the surveyed journals. Articles that
seem to be of most interest to the practicing gynecologic oncologist are
included. The journals that are surveyed are
New England Journal of
Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology,
Gynecologic Oncology,
Cancer,
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Lancet, Cancer Research,
Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
Journal of the American Medical Association
and American Journal of Surgical Pathology.
The participants in this program are the active clinical fellows at
Memorial Hospital: Mario Leitao, Christopher Awtrey, Sarah Ferguson, Alan
Schlaerth, Destin Black and Margrit Juretzka. The managing editor is Douglas Levine. Comments, questions,
complaints and suggestions are always welcome, please E-mail us at:
VJC@smgo.org or
click here. To subscribe or
unsubscribe to the VJC,
click here.
Gynecologic Oncology –
Christopher Awtrey
Title: Phase II trial of alternating courses of megestrol acetate and
tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group
study
Authors: James V. Fiorica, Virginia L. Brunetto, Parviz Hanjani,
Samuel S. Lentz, Robert Mannel and Willie Andersen
Source: Gynecologic Oncology, Volume 92, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages
10-14
Summary: This is one of
two articles in this month’s Gynecologic Oncology that looks at the
clinical value of adding tamoxifen to progestins in the treatment of
advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. This article describes GOG # 153
in which megestrol acetate (MA) 80 mg given BID for 3 weeks was alternated
with tamoxifen (T) citrate 20 mg PO BID for 3 weeks. This sequence was
given until disease progression or until adverse effects prohibited
further therapy. Of 56 evaluable patients who had not received prior
cytotoxic or hormonal therapy, there were 15 responses for a response rate
of 27%. There were 12 CR’s and 3 PR’s. Responses were seen in 31% of
patients with extra-pelvic disease as opposed to 14% for those with
vaginal or pelvic disease only. The median PFS was 2.7 months for the
group and the most serious adverse effect noted were thromboembolic
events. There were 2 DVT’s and 3 PE's. The authors conclude that this
regimen of alternating MA and T is active in treating endometrial cancer
and may result in a prolonged CR in some patients.
Click here for abstract from
Gynecologic Oncology
Title: Phase II study of medroxyprogesterone acetate plus tamoxifen in
advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Authors: Charles W. Whitney, Virginia L. Brunetto, Richard J. Zaino,
Samuel S. Lentz, Joel Sorosky, Deborah K. Armstrong and Roger B. Lee
Source: Gynecologic Oncology, Volume 92, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages
4-9
Summary: This paper
examines the use of the combination of progestin and tamoxifen in the
treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. This
study is GOG # 119 and patients received a 20 mg BID of tamoxifen given
continuously. On alternating even numbered weeks they also received 100 mg
PO BID of MPA. In this study of 58 evaluable patients medication was
administered until disease progression or an adverse event. There were 6
complete and 13 partial responses for a total response rate of 33%. The
median PFS was 3 months and the median overall survival was 13 months.
This response rate is similar to that seen for active single agent
cytotoxic chemotherapy suggesting that this treatment should be studied
further as these initial results are promising.
Click here for abstract from
Gynecologic Oncology
Return to top of
page
Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Mario Leitao
Nothing of interest this month
Journal of the National Cancer
Institute – Alan Schlaerth
[Ed note: There were two articles in the January 7,
2004 issue of JNCI that investigated the risk of colorectal cancer
in Jewish BRCA mutations carriers. Both studies were unable to
demonstrate any increased risk of colorectal cancer associated with
BRCA founder mutations. This is noteworthy information when
counseling BRCA heterozygotes for prophylactic oophorectomy and
other related issues. Links to these abstracts can be found here:
article 1 and
article 2.]
Title: Risk of Malignant Mixed
Mullerian Tumors After Tamoxifen Therapy for Breast Cancer
Authors: Rochelle E. Curtis, D. Michal Freedman, Mark E. Sherman, and
Joseph F. Fraumeni, Jr
Source: J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 70-74
Summary: Recent studies have indicated that the
tamoxifen-related risk of uterine corpus cancer may be especially high for
some uncommon cell types. Data from 39 451 breast cancer patients
diagnosed from 1980 through 2000 who were initially treated with tamoxifen
were evaluated and found that the overall risk of subsequent uterine
corpus cancer was increased more than twofold (observed-to-expected ratio
[O/E] = 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95 to 2.41) relative to the
general SEER population. The relative risk was substantially higher for
malignant mixed mullerian tumors (MMMTs) (O/E = 4.62, O = 34, 95% CI =
3.20 to 6.46) than for endometrial adenocarcinomas (O/E = 2.07, O = 306,
95% CI = 1.85 to 2.32), although the excess absolute risk was smaller—an
additional 1.4 versus 8.4 cancers per 10 000 women per year, respectively.
Among those who survived for 5 years or longer, there was an eightfold
relative risk for MMMTs and a 2.3-fold risk for endometrial
adenocarcinomas, with patients developing MMMTs having a worse prognosis.
These findings indicate that tamoxifen may have delayed effects, such as
the increased risk of MMMTs, rare but aggressive tumors of unclear
pathogenesis.
Click here for abstract from
JNCI
Return to top of
page
Obstetrics and Gynecology
– Margrit Juretzka
Nothing of interest this month
American Journal of Obstetrics
and Gynecology – Sarah Ferguson
Title: Glassy cell adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
Authors: Michael P. Hopkins and George W. Morley
Source: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Volume 190,
Issue 1, January 2004, Pages 67-70
Summary: Due to the
controversy over whether glassy cell adenocarcinoma has a worse outcome
then other variants of cervical adenocarcinoma, the authors report a case
series of 21 women with glassy cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix treated
at a single institution from 1970 to 1985. The mean age of diagnosis was44
years (range 12-69. The patients were distributed by stage as follows:
stage I = 10; stage II = 8; stage III = 1; and stage IV = 2. The
cumulative 5 years survival for all stage I glassy cell adenocarcinomas
was not significantly different when compared with stage I non-glassy cell
adenocarcinomas (61% vs 48%). In comparisons to previously published
series this is a similar survival excluding the original report by
Glucksman and Cherry (1956) which did not specify stage. The authors
conclude that stage I glassy cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix has a
5-year overall survival approaching 60%, which is similar to other
subtypes of cervical adenocarcinoma. Unfortunately, advanced stage disease
has a uniformly poor prognosis.
Click here for abstract from
Am J Ob/Gyn
Return to top of
page
New England Journal of
Medicine – Mario Leitao
Nothing of interest this month
Journal of the American
Medical Association – Margrit Juretzka
Nothing of interest this month
Cancer
– Destin Black
Title: Surgical treatment of recurrent
endometrial carcinoma
Authors: Elio Campagnutta, M.D., Giorgio
Giorda, M.D., Giovanni De Piero, M.D., Francesco Sopracordevole, M.D., M.
Caterina Visentin, M.D., Luca Martella, M.D., Carlo Scarabelli, M.D.
Source: Cancer,
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 89-96
Summary:
This retrospective analysis included 75 patients who underwent secondary
cytoreductive surgery for pelvic or abdominal endometrial cancer
recurrence. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) pelvic or abdominal
recurrence with or without liver, abdominal wall, inguinal, or vulvar
involvement; 2) central pelvic-vaginal recurrence measuring > 4 cm or with
lateral pelvic side-wall extension; 3) Gynecologic Oncology Group
performance status < 4; and 4) absence of lung, bone, or brain metastases.
Patients with < 1cm residual tumor were classified as optimally debulked.
Postoperative salvage therapy after secondary surgery was undertaken at the
discretion of the medical oncologist. Fifty-six patients (74.7%) were
optimally debulked and the mortality rate for surgical complications after
the postoperative period was 8%. Patients who were secondarily optimally
debulked had a significantly better cumulative survival than patients who
had residual disease (36% vs. 0% at 60 months P<0.05). In addition
to residual disease, the authors found that chemotherapy use after secondary
surgery and central pelvis-vagina as the only site of recurrence were also
associated with better survival.
The authors conclude that this approach has a high mortality rate, yet can
useful in improving overall survival. Careful selection of patients is
key.
Click here for abstract from
Cancer
Return to top of
page
Lancet
– Sarah Ferguson
Nothing of interest this month
Cancer Research
– Destin Black
Nothing of interest this month
American Journal of Surgical Pathology
–
Alan Schlaerth
Nothing of interest this month
Return to top of page