The following articles
appeared in this month's issues of the surveyed journals. Articles that
seem to be of most interest to the practicing gynecologic oncologist are
included. The journals that are surveyed are
New England Journal of
Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology,
Gynecologic Oncology,
Cancer,
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Lancet, Cancer Research,
Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
Journal of the American Medical Association
and American Journal of Surgical Pathology.
The participants in this program are the active clinical fellows at
Memorial Hospital: Christopher Awtrey, Sarah Ferguson, Alan Schlaerth,
Destin Black, Margrit Juretzka, and Eric Eisenhauer. The managing editor is Douglas Levine. Comments, questions,
complaints and suggestions are always welcome, please E-mail us at:
VJC@smgo.org or
click here. To subscribe or
unsubscribe to the VJC,
click here.
Gynecologic Oncology – Alan C.
Schlaerth
Title: Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment for intermediate
risk endometrial cancer: postoperative brachytherapy vs. observation
Authors: James Fanning, Michael
L. Hoffman, Stephen J. Andrews, Allen W. Harrah and John J. Feldmeier
Source: Gynecologic Oncology,
Volume 93, Issue 3, June 2004, Pages 632-636.
Summary: The authors
compared survival, cost, and morbidity in treating intermediate risk
endometrial cancer (Stage IC, IG3, II—tumors limited to the uterus with
greater than 50% myometrial invasion or poor differentiation or cervical
metastasis) with postoperative vaginal cuff brachytherapy versus
observation followed by treatment for vaginal recurrence. Only 8% of
patients develop a vaginal recurrence and withholding postoperative
brachytherapy for intermediate risk endometrial cancer patients resulted
in a 31% decrease in cost, a similar radiation complication rate, and a 3%
decrease in survival. In monetary terms, the cost per life saved was
$38,764.
Click here for abstract from
Gynecologic Oncology
Title: Optimal surgical cytoreduction in patients with Stage III and
Stage IV endometrial carcinoma: a study of morbidity and survival
Authors: Nicholas C. Lambrou,
Orlando Gómez-Marín, Ramin Mirhashemi, Heather Beach, Emery Salom, Zoyla
Almeida-Parra and Manuel Peñalver
Source: Gynecologic Oncology,
Volume 93, Issue 3, June 2004, Pages 653-658.
Summary: This study
evaluated survival outcomes and overall morbidity in Stage III and IV
endometrial cancer patients with suboptimal vs optimal cytoreduction.
After excluding patients with serous and clear cell tumors, 85 patients
were identified. 28% of the patients had suboptimal cytoreduction
and survived 6.7 months versus 17.8 months for 72% of patients with
optimal resections. Similarly, major postoperative complications (37.5%
vs. 7.25%, p=0.005), unplanned SICU admissions (31.25% vs 7.25%, p=0.018)
and length of stay exceeding 15 days (31.25% v 4.35%, p=0.005) was greater
in patients with suboptimal cytoreductive surgery. The authors
conclude that overall survival is lower and morbidity is higher in
patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma having suboptimal
cytoreduction at the time of primary surgery.
Click here for abstract from
Gynecologic Oncology
Title: A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal
hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of
cervical cancer
Authors: H. Steed, B. Rosen, J.
Murphy, S. Laframboise, D. De Petrillo and A. Covens
Source: Gynecologic Oncology,
Volume 93, Issue 3, June 2004, Pages 588-593
Summary: The authors
from one institution compared perioperative morbidity and recurrence free
survival in early-stage cervical cancer patients treated by
laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH, n=71) versus
radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH, n=205). LARVH patients had lower
estimated blood loss 300cc vs. 500cc (p< 0.001), longer operative times
3.5 h vs. 2.5 h (p< 0.001), and more intraoperative complications 13% vs.
4% (p< 0.03). Median hospital stay was 1 day for LARVH patients as
compared to 5 days for patients undergoing RAH. The overall 2-year
recurrence free survivals were 94% in both the LARVH and RAH groups. The
authors conclude that early stage cervical cancer can be treated
successfully with LARVH with similar efficacy and recurrence rates to RAH.
Click here for abstract from
Gynecologic Oncology
Return to top of
page
Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Christopher Awtrey
Title: Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin
Plus Cisplatin With or Without Paclitaxel Plus Filgrastim in Advanced
Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
Authors: Fleming, Gini F.,
Brunetto, Virginia L., Cella, David, Look, Katherine Y., Reid, Gary C.,
Munkarah, Adnan R., Kline, Richard, Burger, Robert A., Goodman,
Annekathryn, Burks, R. Tucker
Source: J Clin Oncol 2004 22:
2159-2166
Summary: This article reports the results of GOG #177 which compared
the three drug regimen of cisplatin, Adriamycin and Taxol with the
standard two drug regimen of Adriamycin and cisplatin using GCSF support
for both arms. 273 patients with advanced or recurrent
endometrial carcinoma were enrolled onto the study and received 7 cycles
of the standard treatment of Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 with
GCSF support every 21 days or Doxorubicin 45 mg/m2, Cisplatin 50 mg/m2,
Paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 with GCSF support. The three drug combination was
superior in terms of overall response (57% versus 34%, p<0.01), PFS (8.3
versus 5.3 mos., p<0.01) and OS (15.3 versus 12.3 mos., p<0.04). The use
of GCSF support was important for the study as there was little difference
between the groups with respect to the rate of hematologic toxicity which
was quite low (AP 2% versus TAP 3%). 39% of TAP patients developed either
a grade 2 or 3 neuropathy versus 5% in the AP arm. Overall this is an
important study as it demonstrates the effectiveness and side effects of
using Taxol in combination with platinum and Adriamycin in treating
patients with advanced cases of endometrial cancer.
Click here for abstract from
JCO
Return to top of
page
Journal of the National Cancer
Institute – Margrit M. Juretzka
Nothing of interest this month
Obstetrics and Gynecology
– Destin R. Black
Title: Ovarian Cancer Risk After the
Use of Ovulation-Stimulating Drugs
Authors: Brinton, Louise A.,
Lamb, Emmet J., Moghissi, Kamran S., Scoccia, Bert, Althuis, Michelle D.,
Mabie, Jerome E., Westhoff, Carolyn L.
Source: Obstet Gynecol 2004 103:
1194-1203
Summary: This retrospective cohort study of 12,193 women treated for
infertility assessed the long-term effects of ovulation-stimulating drugs
on the risk of ovarian cancer. The authors found that
ovarian cancer risks were similar for patients
unexposed and those exposed to clomiphene. The standardized incidence
ratio for subjects unexposed to clomiphene was 2.09 (95% CI 1.4, 3.0), as
compared with 1.79 (1.0, 3.0) for those exposed. However,
infertility patients had a significantly elevated ovarian cancer risk
compared with the general population (standardized incidence ratio 1.98,
95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.4, 2.6). The authors concluded that there
is not a strong link between ovulation-stimulating drugs and ovarian
cancer.
Click here for abstract from
OB/GYN
Return to top of
page
American Journal of Obstetrics
and Gynecology – Margrit M. Juretzka
Nothing of interest this month
New England Journal of
Medicine – Christopher S. Awtrey
Nothing of interest this month
Journal of the American
Medical Association – Destin R. Black
Title: Frequency of Symptoms of
Ovarian Cancer in Women Presenting to Primary Care Clinics
Authors: Goff, Barbara A.,
Mandel, Lynn S., Melancon, Cindy H., Muntz, Howard G.
Source: JAMA 2004 291: 2705-2712
Summary: The authors administered
an anonymous questionnaire regarding frequency, severity, and duration of
symptoms to women who visited 2 primary care clinics (N = 1709) and
preoperatively to 128 women with a pelvic mass (84 benign and 44
malignant). The combination of bloating, increased abdominal size, and
urinary symptoms was found in 43% of those with cancer but in only 8% of
those presenting to primary care clinics. In addition, women with
malignant masses typically experienced symptoms 20 to 30 times per month
and had significantly more symptoms of higher severity and more recent
onset than women with benign masses or controls. The authors concluded
that further diagnostic investigation is warranted for women that
experience symptoms that are more severe or frequent than expected and of
recent onset.
Click here for abstract from
JAMA
Return to top of
page
Cancer
– Sarah E. Ferguson
Nothing of interest this month
Lancet
– Destin R. Black
Nothing of interest this month
Cancer Research
– Eric Eisenhauer
Nothing of interest this month
American Journal of Surgical Pathology
–
Sarah E. Ferguson
Title: More Differences Between HNPCC-related
and Sporadic Carcinomas From the Endometrium as Compared to the Colon
Authors:
van den Bos, Maartje; van
den Hoven, Mabel; Jongejan, Esther; van der Leij, Femke; Michels, Meta;
Schakenraad, Sandra; Aben, Katja PHD; Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline MD, PHD;
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn PHD; Han van Krieken, J MD, PHD
Source: American Journal of
Surgical Pathology. 28(6):706-711, June 2004
Summary: To recognize hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
(HNPCC)-related endometrial carcinoma from sporadic carcinoma by
histologic features as compared with colonic cases, the authors performed
a case-control study. Six HNPCC-related endometrial and 18 colorectal
carcinomas were selected. For every HNPCC-related tumor, 2 sporadic
control cases were included. HNPCC-related endometrial carcinomas were
significantly more often poorly differentiated (83% versus 27%), showed
the presence of a Crohn-like lymphoid reaction (100% versus 13%) and
lymphangioinvasive growth (67% versus 0%), and high number of
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were more often present (100% versus 36%)
compared with sporadic endometrial carcinomas. The differences between
HNPCC and sporadic colorectal cancer specimens were less discriminating.
Click here for abstract from
AM J Surg Path
Title: Malignant Melanoma Involving
the Ovary: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 23 Cases
Authors:
Gupta, Deepali MD; Deavers,
Michael T MD; Silva, Elvio G MD; Malpica, Anais MD
Source: American Journal of
Surgical Pathology. 28(6):771-780, June 2004
Summary: Ovarian malignant melanoma (MM), primary or metastatic,
is an extremely rare tumor and can represent a diagnostic challenge. The
clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 23 cases over a
period of 40 years (1962-2001) were reviewed. The patients' age ranged
from 14 to 53 years (mean 35.7 years). A previous history of MM was
definitively obtained in 14 patients. The tumor was grossly
pigmented in 8 cases (35%). S-100 was positive in 18 of 19 cases, HMB-45
in 17 of 20 cases, MART-1 in 13 of 15 cases, tyrosinase in 10 of 15 cases,
and Mitf in 8 of 14 cases. Inhibin was positive in 3 of 14 cases.
Calretinin was focally positive in 1 of 12 cases. All but one patient had
metastases in other organs, most often in the lungs. Thirteen patients
died of disease (range 2-76 months), 3 are alive with disease (6-18
months), and 2 have no evidence of disease at 24 and 96 months; one was
the patient with melanoma arising within a teratoma. In conclusion, MM
involving the ovary is a rare disease, predominantly seen in women of
reproductive age, and is associated with a poor prognosis. The tumor is
most often metastatic from another site. S-100 is the most sensitive
marker. MART-1 was positive in the few cases that were negative with
HMB-45. Inhibin can be focally positive in some cases.
Click here for abstract from
AM J Surg Path
Return to top of
page
This issue of the Virtual Journal Club is sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline.